NEW PRIMORDIAL CHAOS
Kaikodo Journal,
March 2015
New
Primordial Chaos 2014
Photograph,
ink on mitsumata washi paper
Mounted as a handscroll
29.7 x 86.2 cm. (11 3/4 x 34 in.)
When Zhu Derun
(1294-1365), a
Yuan-period calligrapher, painter and poet from Henan province, created his
Hunlun tu, variously translated
as "Primordial Chaos" or the "Cosmic Circle," in the mid-14th century, he took
inspiration for the rocks and tree, loamy banks and streaming vines from his
10th and 11th century predecessors, Li Cheng and Guo Xi, from whom a style of
painting had evolved known as the Li-Guo school and of which Zhu Derun was a
brilliant advocate (fig.
1 (top image)).
In this painting, Zhu appears to push the style
to an extreme, particularly with the meandering calligraphic tendrils streaming
from the landscape elements, unfurling, casting out into space, playfully,
teasingly, abstractly, mysteriously, and there looming beneath this unharnessed
line, is a perfect circle, likely drawn with a compass, and perfectly empty or
perfectly full; the enigma begins.
Zhu had stepped out of
the traditional Chinese painter's zone with these additions to a familiar
composition.
"Additions" is actually a misleading term since
the circle, the hunlun, is indeed the primary subject of the painting.
And it is that circle that was the inspiration
for and raison d'etre behind the
photograph here by the contemporary artist Michael Cherney.
Zhu
had a vision in the 14th century; Michael was able to complete it in the 21st
when he gave that vision contemporary form and meaning through a contemporary
medium, photography.
Michael superimposed a photograph of the sun
precisely within the perimeter of Zhu's circle:
"..
I overlaid my negative in order to make the sizes and proportions exact. So
New
Primordial Chaos will be the exact same dimensions as Zhu Derun’s Primordial
Chaos (29.7 x 86.2 cm), with the circle being the same size and in the same
location in both" (fig.
2 (bottom image)).
But what really is this
subject? What does it all mean?
We turn to James Cahill, whom Michael and
others quote in reference to the 14th-century masterwork:
"Hunlun, the title of the painting--refers to the great
undifferentiated matter out of which the cosmos was formed, and the
philosophical
intent of the work is stated in Zhu's
inscription which takes the form of a brief essay on this Daoist cosmological
concept:
'Primordial chaos is not
square but round, not round but square. Before the appearance of heaven and
earth there were no forms; yet forms existed.
After the appearance of heaven and earth forms
existed but became undefined, their constant expansion and
contraction, furling and unfurling making them
beyond measure. '"1
To quote Cahill further:
"The work, in keeping with this theme, is part
picture, part cosmic diagram.
The objects in it represent, among other
things, states of transformation or rates of growth and decay: very slow
in the earth and rock, somewhat faster in the
pine, faster still in the wind-blown, 'unfurling' vines.
One might be tempted to read the circle at the
right as another symbol of change, the inconstant moon, or its reflection in the
water, but it is too large and too abstract to encourage that reading and must
in some way represent the circular
hunlun itself."2
If Zhu's circle represents "primordial chaos," out
of which existence emerged, appeared, took form, Michael's "New Primordial
Chaos," expresses the chaos revisited upon creation, a man-made, human-generated
chaos that is so overwhelming and toxic that it can cloud the sun, deform it,
make it in fact look not even like itself, but like its dark sister, the moon.
In actuality the photograph is of the sun: "Dear
Mary Ann, you have my personal guarantee that it is indeed the sun! Though
the Beijing days are bad, they are only occasionally as ‘apocalyptic’ as the day
the photograph was taken (the Air Quality Index was reading 517 at the time; for
reference, I have been told that spending the day outside on a day with a
reading of 300 would be equivalent to smoking two packs of cigarettes).
Because of the constant shifts in atmosphere, and given that it was film
photography (not able to see the results until after the film is developed), I
shot several rolls. Out of all of the resulting shots, the image chosen for
XHLT did most resemble the moon, because I purposefully wanted to create that
sense of confusion, the first impression being that one is looking at the moon,
when in actuality it is the sun. James Cahill specifically mentioned that
the circle in Zhu Derun’s painting did not represent either the moon or the sun;
rather it is Primordial Chaos. So I was trying to preserve that aspect."
Zhu Derun's world of flux, expressed in his paintings
through the Li-Guo mode, derives from a nature not yet tarnished, one whose
machinations and mysteries led to some cosmological deliberation ranging from
the metaphysical and theological to the semi-scientific and scientific. In the
hands of artists, images were created reflecting, whether intentional or not,
these beliefs, paradigms, systems.
Given Zhu Derun's viewpoint, it makes sense that he
would be comfortable working in the Li-Guo manner of painting, where the earth
and its "stuff" are
not stable, solidified and set, but in flux, taking form and then dissolving,
with "constant expansion and contraction," and the brushwork not crisp and
static, hard and sharp, but fluid, malleable, vacillating. It is also not
surprising that Michael Cherney would find soul mates in this noble lineage,
that Zhu would provide that link to creation and cosmic workings that also
occupy Michael.
Returning to Cherney's work, which also must be considered independently from
the handscroll by Zhu Derun, the black ground with bright orb is easily and
immediately read as night sky and moon--the sun, after all, does not shine in
the night sky.
As we know, it is not that simple.
The dark ground, then, might be read as the
"Grand Emptiness" of ancient Chinese belief, out of which cosmic bodies emerged
and evolved, or in Edward Schafer's words, "the matrix in which the celestial
bodies are embedded, "the orb here, the sun-star, representing this evolution.3
Also, knowing that the orb is in fact the
sun,
we might see the scroll as a representation of darkness prevailing despite the
presence of the sun, and thus a comment on our current state of existence and
predicament.
I am only sad that Jim Cahill is gone because he would have
been deeply moved by this work: his two great passions, the art of the Chinese
painter and the health of the earth, given new form and new meaning by a certain
Michael Cherney, born in New York in 1969.
Michael Cherney, studied Chinese and East
Asian history at the State University of New York at Binghamton, and studied
further at the Beijing Language Institute
and
is a self- taught photographer, perhaps inspired by his renowned grandfather,
the award-winning photographer Charles Hoff. Michael's formal studies of Chinese
and East Asian history, combined with his rigorous personal studies of China's
religious and art historical past, have resulted in his abiding appreciation and
even reverence for China's historical journey and its great classic tradition of
painting, particularly landscape painting, a passion which resulted in the
creation of the present work.. His relationship with China was deepened by
residence in Beijing and for well over two decades extensive travelling in China
where he was able to seek out the mysterious mountain haunts and specific sites
that have historical or art historical relevance to his work, and to experience
on a daily basis life in the modern city that is Beijing.
A carefully selected subject, a
photograph, painstaking cropping and digital tooling and printing on a special
paper, together result in the compelling images we associate with his work.
Rather than distracting from the mood and integrity of many of his works,
Michael will affix one or more seals to the mounting rather than to the
photograph itself, as in the present case, seals that he himself has designed
and deftly carved. Through his background, creations and commitment, Michael has
indeed earned a Chinese name, Qiu Mai, one by which he is widely known.
Included among the numerous formats that serve as the stages for his
photography are books or albums, hanging scrolls, handscrolls, large-scale
screens, round and folding fan shapes. His
works have caught the attention and garnered praise from many corners and
representative works can be seen in The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York
City, at the University Museums at Princeton, Harvard and Yale, at the Getty
Museum in Los Angeles. the Wellin Museum of
Art at Hamilton College in Clinton, New York, the Santa Barbara Museum of Art,
and the Chengdu Contemporary Art Museum
1.
James Cahill in Richard Barnhart, et
al., Three Thousand Years of Chinese Painting, Yale University Press, New
Haven, 1997, p. 163.
2. Ibid.
Even
if we accept this interpretation, if we read the 'unfurling' tendrils or "line"
in reverse, as we would play a film "backward,” we would see the line as furling
into form, or as the coalescence of bits and particles, of atoms and molecules
comprising original chaos, linking together and pouring into form, natural
forms, which is also the painter's line creating pictorial forms.
3. Edward H. Schafer,
Pacing the
Void: T'ang Approaches to the Stars, Berkeley,
1977, p. 30.
Fig. 1:
Zhu Derun (1294-1365), Hunlun tu, "Primordial Chaos," dated 1349 (29.7 x 86.2
cm.), Shanghai Museum, after
http://unurthed.com/2007/11/30/zhu-derun-on-primordial-chaos/
Fig. 2: Overlay of
Primordial Chaos on
New Primordial Chaos.